Connected there with is also the question of whether the government should give its patronage to these organisations and institutions to function on their own. The bill only deals with the second part of the question but the determination of the issue depends, to a very great extent, on what we consider to be our answer to the first part also. It is now well known that we have adopted the principle of the welfare state and that we now look up to the state to  go to the help of the needy citizen in some of his needs that are so very urgent and important and the fulfilment of which is considered to be so necessary from the point of view not only of the welfare of the individual but of the stability of the community also, and it is on this principle that we expect the state to undertake and discharge these functions. Therefore, it is desirable that the religious institutions and organisations are discouraged, as far as possible, from undertaking these obligation because of the fact that the need of citizen has nothing to do with the caste or the religion to which he belongs. Sir, this is the tenth report that has come before the hon. House for its comments. We are aware, Sir, that on previous occasions certain matters were discussed and I am very happy to find that the U.P.S.C have acknowledged the full cooperation which the ministries and the departments have given them in carrying out their duties. So far as the rpesent report is concerned, it has mentioned certain circumstances which have to be looked into very carefully. It has also pointed out certain difficulties in getting the full strength from recruitment. It has also pointed out certain irregularities. There had been a difference of opinion and the government had to depart from their advice and take action on the lines that have been pointed out in the memorandum. Thus, you will find, Sir, that the views expressed and the recommendations made by the U.P.S.C. Should receive the fullest respect and that as far as possible they should be implemented.
